-
The God of the Bible exists.
-
The God of the Bible is capable of preparing and prompting people to do things.
-
God used people to write the Bible.
-
God had things he wanted to communicated through those human writers.
-
God was capable of steering circumstances to accomplish those communication goals through human writers.
-
God’s standards for accomplishing these goals were not undermined by the limitations of the people he prompted to write.
-
If God’s communication goals had been threatened by writers he prompted, he would have prompted different writers.
-
Biblical (=ancient) writers did what they did because of their cognitive environment — which was shared by their immediate audience.
- Biblical writers utilized techniques that conformed to audience expectations and comprehension.
- The consumer will know whether the product is legitimate
- People are familiar with the templates at the time
- Revelation 4-5 — the law suite scene
- We should therefore judge Scripture by God’s standards, not our own.
- Does it connect with the original audience well?
- Written for us, but not to us.
-
Our definitions of concepts like inerrancy and historicity should conform to God’s standards.
- The alternative = judging the Bible as not confirming to what God didn’t intend it to be, which is incoherent.
- Genesis has more than 1 way to interpret
- Are you angry at your dog for not being a cat?
- You’re not happy with the Bible for it not making you happy?
Utilizing those assumptions
To prepare us for approaching the Bible and thinking carefully about the Bible
- The biblical writers weren’t us.
- They didn’t think, act like us
- The biblical writers wrote to people alive at the same time they were.
- Express themselves in ways their audience understand
- The Bible’s dots are not connected by its writers. You’re not one of them.
- Read how they read and interpret each other
- The Bible is not a channeled book.
- X-Files view of the Bible
- Trying to involve people as little as possible
- No point of biblical teaching derives from a single verse.
- God will repeat his points.
- No verse on the origin of the soul (if God wants us to know)
- God will handle clarity
-
Writers write intentionally.
- There’s no cosmic law that says you must say everything you could say when telling a story or making a point.
- You don’t learn everything you need from the passage, you should throw it away
-
One writer’s goals aren’t necessarily another writer’s goal.
- The Bible never claims to be an exhaustive repository of everything that’s true.
- The Bible records what God wants the believing community to know
- There is no reason to believe each biblical writer knew all the things every other biblical writer knew and wrote about.
- Kingdom - Progressive Revelation
- Certain events informed future/past events
- There’s no cosmic law that says everything in the Bible must be unique to the Bible.
- Biblical writers were not Martians
- They live in ANE - their cultures might be the same (overlap)
Takeaways
For apologetics & interpretation
Reading/Listening Material for Today
(Ch 6, Bible Unfiltered)
Uber-literalism
- Can make the Bible vulnerable to criticism
- Isn’t the way language works, even today
- Can impede interpretation (Luke 1:78-79)
When a plain sense make sense, seek no other sense.
- Sometimes context may forbid literalism.
- Dictionary vs Encyclopedia
- Cognitive environment - the word “father”
- Men & women - thoughts are better
- Based on experience
- Pulpit
- Elevated platform or high reading desk used in preaching or conducting a worship service
- a: the reaching profession b: a preaching position
- Church theology determines the meaning of pulpit
- Catholic has an altar
- Lutheran has 2
- Baptist - in the middle
- Zechariah in Luke 1:78-79
- Sunrise? (Anatole) LXX translate “branch” (Messiah)
- Shoot, twig, rise
- LXX gives the cognitive environment we use to understand the Bible